By: Dr. Sagir Buhari FCIA
Governance has been defined in various ways by scholars. Sir David Easton defines it as the process of making and implementing decisions that are binding on society. Harold Lasswell views governance as the study of the shaping and sharing of power. Robert Dahl defines it as the process of making decisions that affect citizens’ lives. In contrast, James Rosenau defines governance as systems of rule, the exercise of authority, and the provision of public goods and services. According to the World Bank, governance refers to the system of rules, practices, and processes by which an organization, institution, or state is directed and controlled.
These definitions collectively emphasize key aspects of governance, including decision-making processes, power dynamics and authority, provision of public goods and services, and rule of law and institutional frameworks. This highlights the complexities and nuances of governance.
Governance refers to the system of rules, practices, and processes by which an organization, institution, or state is directed and controlled. It encompasses the mechanisms, relationships, and institutions through which citizens and groups articulate their interests, exercise their rights and obligations, and mediate their differences.
As a political scientist, I emphasize the vital role of objective criticism in promoting a healthy democracy. This approach focuses on policies, actions, and ideas, rather than personal attacks, facilitating respectful engagement, informed discourse, and the exchange of ideas.
In the realm of politics, objective criticism is essential for fostering a healthy democracy, wherein citizens’ voices are heard, and their concerns are addressed. By maintaining a clear distinction between objective criticism and personal insults, we can promote a culture of civility, respect, and open-mindedness in politics.
The benefits of objective criticism are numerous and multifaceted. Firstly, holding leaders accountable ensures that they are answerable for their actions and policies, which promotes transparency and accountability within the government. Secondly, improving policies and decision-making helps refine policies and decision-making processes, leading to more effective governance.
Thirdly, encouraging transparency and accountability promotes a culture of openness and honesty within the government, which is essential for building trust between citizens and their leaders. Lastly, fostering informed public discourse enables citizens to engage meaningfully in the democratic process, making informed decisions, and participating actively in shaping their country’s future.
In the context of International Relations, understanding the complexities of global issues requires a multidisciplinary approach, incorporating aspects of politics, economics, history, and cultural studies. This holistic approach enables us to analyze the world and its complexities on a broad scale.
In conclusion, objective criticism is a cornerstone of democratic governance, and its importance cannot be overstated. By embracing constructive criticism and objective analysis, we can promote a healthy democracy, foster respectful dialogue, ensure that leaders are accountable to the people, and ultimately, build a more just and equitable society.
Dr. Sagir Buhari FCIA
(Studied Political Science and International Relations)
buharisageer@gmail.com
21 December, 2024
